Ketahanan informasional aktivis gen-z Terhadap kebijakan board of peace:Konstruksi cyber-ri'ayah framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jipmor.v4i2.63Keywords:
informational resilience, gen-Z, board of peace, digital peacebuilding, cyber-ri'ayah frameworkAbstract
This study analyzes Generation Z (Gen-Z) activists' informational resilience regarding the Board of Peace (BoP) policy and constructs a digital conflict mitigation model. Employing an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, quantitative data were collected through a preliminary survey of 37 Gen-Z activists in Bandung, followed by thematic analysis to explain statistical anomalies. Results reveal that activists' perceptions of BoP do not significantly affect their informational resilience (p = 0.074), with the model explaining only 8.8% of the variance. Descriptive analysis indicates 81% perceive BoP as limiting free speech, while 70.2% exhibit in-group bias by sharing unverified organizational information. These findings indicate a conceptual irony between the normative administrative security approach and Gen-Z's transnational activism, which views politics integrally as Ri'ayah (the obligation to manage the interests of the ummah). This study proposes the Cyber-Ri'ayah Framework (CRF), integrating UNESCO's cyberpeace protocols with Islamic communicative ethics, specifically Tabayyun (critical verification). The CRF offers a paradigm shift from repressive administrative security toward participatory digital peacebuilding, contributing to the literature on transnational digital activism and communication ethics in the post-truth era.
References
Al-Mawardi, A. H. (1989). Al-Ahkam Al-Sultaniyyah wa al-Wilayat al-Diniyyah. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
Boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center.
Earle, T. C., & Siegrist, M. (2006). Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 383–416.
Esposito, J. L. (2010). The future of Islam. Oxford University Press.
Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
Kamrava, M. (2009). Islam's intellectual debate. Oxford University Press.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press.
Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. Routledge.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (Eds.). (2015). Routledge handbook of social media and politics. Routledge.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Shihab, M. Q. (2019). Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, kesan dan keserasian Al-Qur'an. Lentera Hati.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN Publishing.
UNESCO. (2020). Internet universality indicators: A framework for assessing internet ecosystems. UNESCO Publishing.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ferra Martian, Aldin Aldama, Virgy Rahma Rahayu, Daffa Sumarlan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
